Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool?

Method Comparison by Correlation and Agreement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i1.58213

Keywords:

Method comparison; Pearson’s product-moment correlation; Bland–Altman method; Intra class correlation coefficient; Clinical tolerance limit

Abstract

In laboratory, a reliable method is very important to report precise and accurate results which are very important for clinical diagnosis and management decisions. In case the existing method needs to be replaced by new method due to poor results or financial issues, method comparison of a new measurement system/method with an established/referral method is required to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old method or use the two interchangeably. Most commonly Pearson’s product-moment correlation is used to ascertain whether two methods agree sufficiently so that the old method can be replaced by a new method. However, it is the most inappropriate method with number of limitations. In this paper, other methods are discussed with their merits and demerits with examples.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
75
PDF
108

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

How to Cite

Tripathi, C. B. . ., Jha, P. K., & Agarwal, R. . (2024). Method comparison: Statistical measurement correlation or agreement-most appropriate tool? Method Comparison by Correlation and Agreement. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 15(1), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i1.58213

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Review Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).