Tourism Education, Curriculum Spaces, Knowledge Production, and Disciplinary Pluralism

Authors

  • Ramesh Raj Kunwar Academic Advisor to Nepal Mountain Academy, Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Civil Aviation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/gaze.v9i0.19724

Keywords:

tourism education, theories, knowledge production, philosophic practitioner education, disciplinary pluralism

Abstract

In course of designing the courses, the present author in the phase of curriculum coordination, consulted various research papers and books based on the theoretical models of tourism and hospitality education. The review of those works not only have broadened the mind of curriculum designer but also has given knowledge education on various fields of tourism education. It is strongly believed that tourism education will become the backbone and impetus for making tourism as an institution and industry stronger. One of the most important aspects of studying tourism is disciplinarian approach. The sources of knowledge production are based on monodiscipline, multidiscipline, interdiscipline, transdiscipline, extradiscipline, postdiscipline, antidiscipline, metadiscipline and nomadology also coined as disciplinary pluralism or plurydisciplines that have created a disciplinary dilemma. The curriculum should be designed on the basis of praxis and phronesis (Aristotalian thought based on application and theory), Tourism Education Future Initiative’s ( TEFI ) model, John Tribe’s (1997) model ( TF1 and TF2) , Echtner’s (1995) three pronged approach, Mayaka and Akama’s (2007 & 2015) curriculum space model and Koh’s (1994) marketing approach and others. All the above mentioned theoretical models and approaches will help in thinking of and thinking for tourism and hospitality. Simultaneously, it will also help for knowing, seeing, doing and being in the field of education in relation with tourism, hospitality and events (THE). But in this study, only tourism education has been prioritized.

Tourism academic world has debated and advocated regarding different approaches, concepts, models, theories and paradigms developed by different scholars of tourism and hospitality.

The scientific and reliable arguments have been occurred in different timelines, centralized on tourism education, research, knowledge, phenomena, normative and existential knowledge, successful intelligence, learning, life-long learning, collaboration, professionalism competences, scholarship, disciplines, academic territory, academic tribe, field, forcefield, studies, knowledge production, philosophic practitioner, curriculum space, management, social sciences, disciplinary pluralism, liberal and vocational balance in the field of tourism and hospitality subjects that have become the force for understanding tourism education in a better way.

The Gaze: Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Vol.9 2018 p.83-155

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
1052
PDF
4174

Author Biography

Ramesh Raj Kunwar, Academic Advisor to Nepal Mountain Academy, Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Civil Aviation

Prof. Dr. Ramesh Raj Kunwar is the author of eight books on tourism and anthropology. He teaches tourism and hospitality at various universities and colleges as visiting professor. He is the former Dean of Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Tribhuvan University. Previously he is also former Dean of Nepalese Military Academy, Kharipati, Bhaktapur. He is also the Chief Editor of Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Education. He is also one of the Editorial Board Members of Journal on Tourism and Sustainable Development. Currently he has been designated as an Academic Advisor to Nepal Mountain Academy, Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Civil Aviation, Nepal.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-30

How to Cite

Kunwar, R. R. (2018). Tourism Education, Curriculum Spaces, Knowledge Production, and Disciplinary Pluralism. The Gaze: Journal of Tourism and Hospitality, 9, 83–155. https://doi.org/10.3126/gaze.v9i0.19724

Issue

Section

Articles