https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/HPROSPECT/issue/feed Health Prospect 2024-03-11T17:13:52+00:00 Aney Rijal hpec@iom.edu.np Open Journal Systems <p>Health Prospect is an open access and peer reviewed public health journal. Free full text articles are available.</p> <p>The journal is now accepting online submissions. For information on the process <a href="/index.php/HPROSPECT/information/authors" target="_self">click here</a>.</p> https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/HPROSPECT/article/view/62795 Digital health interventions for suicide prevention among LGBTQ: A narrative review 2024-02-15T18:38:01+00:00 Kiran Paudel kiran.paudel@uconn.edu Kamal Gautam kamal.gautam@uconn.edu Prashamsa Bhandari prashamsabhandari@gmail.com Sangam Shah sangam.shah.1997@gmail.com Jeffrey A Wickersham jeffrey.wickersham@yale.edu Bibhav Acharya bibhav.acharya@ucsf.edu Sabitri Sapkota sabitri.sapkota@possiblehealth.org Samir Kumar Adhikari adhikarispk@gmail.com Phanindra Prasad Baral baraldrphanindra@gmail.com Archana Shrestha archana@kusms.edu.np Roman Shrestha roman.shrestha@uconn.edu <p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) are prevalent within the LGBTQ community, often exacerbated by challenges in accessing care and the perceived stigma and discrimination tied to disclosing one's identity. Digital health interventions that offer psychosocial self-help present a promising platform to reach individuals at risk of STB, especially those who may not engage with conventional health services. This review aimed to assess the role of digital-based intervention in reducing STBs among LGBTQ individuals.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> We conducted a systematic literature search from three databases, PsycINFO, PubMed, and CINHAL, from 1<sup>st</sup> Jan 1990 to 31<sup>st</sup> December 2023. The review encompassed studies investigating the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of digital interventions on STBs, employing randomized control trials (RCTs), pseudo-RCTs, observational pre-posttest designs, and qualitative studies. Potential bias was evaluated using the McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Five non-overlapping studies were included, reporting data from 777 participants. The studies featured diverse types of digital interventions, including videos, online writing, and mobile applications. The studies included three RCTs, and two qualitative studies. Across most of these studies, notable enhancements or reductions in the proportion of participants reporting STBs were observed post-intervention, alongside improvements in help-seeking intentions. The findings underscored that the applications used in the studies were engaging, acceptable, and deemed feasible in effectively addressing suicide prevention among the LGBTQ community.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Overall, digital interventions were found to be feasible and acceptable in suicide prevention among LGBTQ communities, demonstrating preliminary efficacy in increasing help-seeking behavior when experiencing suicidal thoughts and in reducing STBs. Therefore, advocating for widespread promotion and dissemination of digital health interventions is crucial, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with limited access to health services and heightened barriers to obtaining such services. Further research using fully powered RCT is imperative to assess the efficacy of these interventions.</p> 2024-03-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Health Prospect