Posterior Instrumentation for Unstable Thoracolumbar Fractures
Keywords:Posterior instrumentation, Spine, Thoracolumbar, Unstable fractures
Background: About 90 percent of all spinal injuries involve the thoracolumbar region. Unstable fractures need surgical treatment to achieve a painless, balanced and stable spine preserving or recovering neurological function, highest degree of spinal motion and to allow early patient mobilization.
Objective: This study was carried out to evaluate radiological outcome of posterior instrumentation in thoracolumbar fractures.
Methodology: A total of 110 patients with thoracolumbar fracture were included in the study, which was carried out at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital from December 2011 to December 2016. Unstable Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen type A and type B fractures were treated with short segment instrumentation and type C with long segment instrumentation. Radiological evaluation of postoperative correction of kyphotic angle and vertebral height was measured and was compared with immediate postoperative correction and loss of correction in two years final follow up.
Results: Mean postoperative correction of vertebral kyphotic angle was 25° and loss of correction in final follow up was 5°. Mean postoperative vertebral height correction was 24% and its loss in final follow up was 2%. There was no significant difference in loss of correction of vertebral kyphosis and vertebral height in short segment and long segment fi xation in final follow up.
Conclusion: Long segment posterior instrumentation results in good reduction and its maintenance for Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen type C thoracolumbar fractures whereas similar results can be achieved with short segment posterior instrumentation in type A and type B fractures.
Journal of Kathmandu Medical College,
Vol. 6, No. 4, Issue 22, Oct.-Dec., 2017, Page: 150-155
How to Cite
Copyright © Journal of Kathmandu Medical College
The ideas and opinions expressed by authors or articles summarized, quoted, or published in full text in this journal represent only the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of Journal of Kathmandu Medical College or the institute with which the author(s) is/are affiliated, unless so specified.
Authors convey all copyright ownership, including any and all rights incidental thereto, exclusively to JKMC, in the event that such work is published by JKMC. JKMC shall own the work, including 1) copyright; 2) the right to grant permission to republish the article in whole or in part, with or without fee; 3) the right to produce preprints or reprints and translate into languages other than English for sale or free distribution; and 4) the right to republish the work in a collection of articles in any other mechanical or electronic format.