A Study on the Determinants of Uterovaginal Prolapse in Tertiary Hospital, Nepal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/jngmc.v23i2.90591Keywords:
Determinants, Pelvic floor repair, Uterovaginal prolapse, Vaginal hysterectomyAbstract
Introduction: Pelvic organ prolapse is the descent of the pelvic organ from its normal position. Although few genetic and idiopathic causes have been associated with it, it most commonly follows difficult and repeated child births, making it one of the most common morbidities in developing countries like Nepal.
Aims: To identify determinants of utero-vaginal prolapse (UVP) among women attending gynecologic department.
Methods: A hospital-based case control study was carried out from March 2023 to March 2025 among women attending Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics at Nepalgunj Medical College.Cases were women with utero-vaginal prolapse while controls were women free from utero-vaginal prolapse but with other gynecologic disease during the same period as of cases. Descriptive analysis along with bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions was performed in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was used and statistical significance was considered at p ≤ 0.05.
Results: Out of 226 cases, only 3(4.1%) of the cases compared to 148(65.5 %) of the controls had attended delivery at health facility. Only 8(10.8%) of cases and 8(5.3%) of the controls had ever used family planning. Only 4(5.4%) of the cases and no controls had history of hysterectomy. Only 15(20.3%) of the cases and 25(16.4%) of the controls had medical problems (history of chronic cough, had history of carrying heavy objects, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and chronic constipation) This study revealed, age ≥ 40 years (AOR = 10.49; 95%CI: 4.03, 27.35), duration of labor ≥ 24 hours (AOR = 8.32; 95%CI: 3.58, 19.33), instrumental delivery (AOR = 7.40; 95%CI: 1.21, 45.28), non- utilization of family planning (AOR = 3.14; 95%CI: 1.32, 7.47) were found to have statistical significance.
Conclusion: Age ≥ 40 years, prolonged labor, instrumental delivery, non-utilization of family planning were identified as determinant factors of utero-vaginal prolapse. Thus, family planning service utilization and appropriate obstetric care are advisable.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any resonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- Non Commercial- The materials cannot be used for commercial purposes.
- No Derivatives- If the material is remixed or transformed or built upon, the modified material cannot be distributed.