Intraperitoneal and periportal injection of bupivacaine for pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors

  • SK Maharjan Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Kathmandu Medical College
  • S Shrestha Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Kathmandu Medical College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v7i1.1765

Keywords:

Laparoscopic surgery, intraperitoneal bupivacaine, analgesia, VAS score

Abstract

Purpose: to study the analgesic efficacy of intraperitoneal and periportal injection of bupivacaine following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Materials and methods: 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into two groups of 20 each. Group A (study group) received 40 ml of intraperitoneal injection of 0.25% bupivacaine and 20 ml of same concentration in 4 ports, 5 ml each at the end of surgery. Group B (control) received no treatment. Post operative patient monitoring and pain assessment was done by another doctor blinded to the procedure using VAS score at 1,2,3,6,9 and 24 hours after surgery. Pethidine 50 mg intramuscular was given as rescue analgesic when demanded by patient within first 24 hours.

Results: when VAS score was analyzed in the two groups, the study group had less scores compared to control group though it was statistically not significant (p > 0.05). The rescue analgesic requirement was significantly less in study group (p < 0.00).

Conclusion: Intraperitoneal and periportal injection of bupivacaine is effective in decreasing pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Key words: Laparoscopic surgery, intraperitoneal bupivacaine, analgesia, VAS score    

doi: 10.3126/kumj.v7i1.1765      

Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2009), Vol. 7, No. 1, Issue 25, 50-53         

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
654
PDF
795

Downloads

How to Cite

Maharjan, S., & Shrestha, S. (2009). Intraperitoneal and periportal injection of bupivacaine for pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 7(1), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v7i1.1765

Issue

Section

Original Articles