Management of refractory septic shock. Can intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation be the answer?

Authors

  • Gentle Sunder Shrestha Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Gaurav Nepal Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/nmmj.v2i1.37222

Keywords:

Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, refratory septic shock

Abstract

Refractory septic shock (RSS) is a subset of septic shock that does not respond to standard resuscitation and to high-dose vasopressor therapy. Management of RSS remains challenging and is associated with increased mortality. There is a dire need to identify a novel therapeutic strategy for the management of RSS. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) are potential options for the management of RSS. Since ECMO is expensive, requires high expertise, and has more complications, IABP can be a feasible therapeutic option. IABP may help clinicians buy the time by supporting the organ perfusion while treating sepsis. Judicious patient selection can be the key. Well designed clinical trials may be the way forward.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
75
PDF
243

Author Biographies

Gentle Sunder Shrestha, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal

Department of Anaesthesiology

Gaurav Nepal, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal

Department of Internal Medicine

Downloads

Published

2021-05-21

How to Cite

Shrestha, G. S., & Nepal, G. (2021). Management of refractory septic shock. Can intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation be the answer?. Nepal Mediciti Medical Journal, 2(1), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.3126/nmmj.v2i1.37222

Issue

Section

Viewpoints