Parliamentary Verbatim in Nepal: The Role of Records in Judicial Interpretation

Authors

  • Shoumya Risal Lawyer/Legislative Researcher
  • Manish Khanal Chief of Staff at MP Secretariat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/sj.v2i1.79857

Keywords:

Parliamentary verbatim, Parliamentary records, Legislative Intent, judicial activism, judicial interpretation

Abstract

Imagine a courtroom scenario in which the judge explores the discussions, disputes, and compromises that gave rise to the legislation straight out of the halls of the Parliament, rather than only relying on the language of the law. This is the power of parliamentary records, such as the well-known Parliamentary verbatim, which provide a window into the legislative soul by exposing the legislation's underlying meaning and essence and the legislators' intents. Currently, Nepal does not have an extensive record of its legislative history. This essay examines the significant ramifications of this omission. It makes the case that a strong system of legislative record-keeping is essential to good governance and goes beyond administrative effectiveness. This paper makes a strong argument for embracing the authority of parliamentary records by exploring the lengthy history of legislative interpretation, comparing it to common law nations, and examining the particular difficulties Nepal faces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
74
PDF
58

Author Biographies

Shoumya Risal, Lawyer/Legislative Researcher

Lawyer/Legislative Researcher

Manish Khanal, Chief of Staff at MP Secretariat

Law Graduate

Downloads

Published

2025-06-09

How to Cite

Risal, S., & Khanal, M. (2025). Parliamentary Verbatim in Nepal: The Role of Records in Judicial Interpretation. Samsad Journal संसद जर्नल, 2(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.3126/sj.v2i1.79857

Issue

Section

Articles