Social Media and Investment Decision of Gen Z in Nepali Capital Market

Authors

  • Upendra Sunar Brixton College
  • Uttam Bahadur Thapa Far Western University

Keywords:

Social media, Behavioral finance, Generation Z, Investment decision, Herding behavior, Overconfidence bias

Abstract

This study aims to examine the impact of social media on stock market investment decisions of Gen Z investors in Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal, specifically on informational and behavioral aspects. The research sought to determine the influence of usefulness, trust, and usage of social media on Gen Z investors, including the moderating effect of herding and overconfidence. The research used a quantitative research approach, where a structured questionnaire was used as a research instrument. The research participants were 220 Gen Z investors, aged 18-28 years. The findings were analyzed using SPSS software version 27 for multiple regression analysis, and Hayes PROCESS Macro version 4 for 5,000 bootstrap samples. The findings suggest that the model accounted for 50.2% of the variance of investment decisions (Adjusted R² = 0.502). The findings suggest that perceived usefulness is a significant factor for investment decisions (β = 0.342, p < 0.001), as is trust (β = 0.187, p = 0.003) and online community engagement (β = 0.168, p = 0.004). Frequency of use is, however, not significant for investment decisions (β = 0.066, p = 0.162). Herding and overconfidence partially mediate these relationships. The findings suggest that social media plays a role in investment decisions, and rational evaluation and behavioral biases of young investors cannot be ignored.

Abstract
2
PDF
4

Downloads

Published

2026-07-14

How to Cite

Sunar, U., & Thapa, U. B. (2026). Social Media and Investment Decision of Gen Z in Nepali Capital Market. The Management Review, 2(1), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.3126/tmr.v2i1.96925

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sunar, U., & Thapa, U. B. (2026). Social Media and Investment Decision of Gen Z in Nepali Capital Market. The Management Review, 2(1), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.3126/tmr.v2i1.96925