Nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized, intubated adult patients: A comparison between conventional blind insertion technique and “throat pack in situ” technique

Authors

  • Vaskar Roy Post Graduate Trainee, Department of Anaesthesiology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research/S.S.K.M. Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3259-2835
  • Sanjay Maitra Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, N.R.S. Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5446-480X
  • Sangita Mandal Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research/S.S.K.M. Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3416-9344
  • Soma Chakraborty Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research/S.S.K.M. Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0253-5183
  • Arpita Laha Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research/S.S.K.M. Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0950-8188
  • Mohanchandra Mandal Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research/S.S.K.M. Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4183-993X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v14i3.50003

Keywords:

Anesthesia; Blind insertion; Intubation; Nasogastric tube; Pharyngeal pack; Throat pack; Sore throat

Abstract

Background: Correct placement of nasogastric tube (NGT) placement often becomes difficult in anesthetized, intubated adult patients due to lack of cooperation from patient and the propensity of the tube to travel the same course of path. Preexisting throat pack is supposed to resist the normal passage of the NGT as per common belief. Only one study has evaluated this in pediatric population and the result is encouraging.

Aims and Objectives: Hence, the present study has been carried out in adult population to compare the success rate of correct placement of NGT in anesthetized intubated adult patients with the pharyngeal (throat) pack in its position in comparison with no throat pack. This is to examine the effect of preexisting throat pack whether it assists or resists the normal passage of the NGT.

Materials and Methods: One hundred and eighty patients were recruited for this interventional and single-blind study. After induction of anesthesia and intubation, the patients were randomized to receive NGT insertion following either blind insertion of the NGT without a pharyngeal pack (group A, n=90) or receive the NGT placement in the same technique but after placement of a pharyngeal pack. The success rate of correct placement of NGT in the first attempt (primary outcome), the procedure time, and adverse events was recorded.

Results: Successful insertion of NGT in first attempt was considerably higher in throat pack in situ group compared to blind insertion without a throat pack 81 (90%) versus 63 (70%), respectively (P=0.001). The procedure time for successful placement of NGT was found comparable between the two groups. Significant decrease in coiling is seen in “throat pack in situ” group compared with blind insertion technique (P=0.003).

Conclusion: In view of considerable higher success rate and reduced adverse events, it can be concluded that the pre-existing appropriately placed throat pack can facilitate the placement of NGT instead of putting any hindrance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
69
PDF
69

Downloads

Published

2023-03-01

How to Cite

Roy, V., Maitra, S., Mandal, S., Chakraborty, S., Arpita Laha, & Mandal, M. (2023). Nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized, intubated adult patients: A comparison between conventional blind insertion technique and “throat pack in situ” technique. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 14(3), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v14i3.50003

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 3 (2023)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).