Feasibility of urolithiasis management after studer neobladder urinary diversion: A multicenter center study

Authors

  • Arvind Kumar Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Superpseciality Hospital, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Anurag Dubey Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Superpseciality Hospital, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7870-3732
  • Praveen Lakhera Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Superpseciality Hospital, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9511-0346
  • Prashant Patel Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Superpseciality Hospital, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2202-7661
  • Avinash Pratap Singh Thakur Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Superpseciality Hospital, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9327-1461
  • Fanindra Singh Solanki Professor, Department of Urology, Superpseciality Hospital, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5198-6429

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v14i6.51167

Keywords:

Urinary diversion; Neobladder; Urolithiasis; Surgical management; Feasibility

Abstract

Background: Stones formation is a common complication after cystectomy including stones of the upper urinary tract and reservoir or conduit. Advances in instrumentation and techniques have expanded treatment options, while minimizing morbidity.

Aims and Objectives: Feasibility of urolithiasis management after urinary diversion surgery.

Materials and Methods: Eleven patients of diversion with stone were observed from January 01, 2015, to July 30, 2022. Operative procedures were decided on basis on stone locations and size. Perioperative parameters were observed and compared with similar studies. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, percutaneous-based antegrade ureteroscopy with semi-rigid or flexible ureteroscope, transurethral reservoir lithotripsy, percutaneous pouch lithotripsy, and open operation were performed. The operative finding and complications were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 53.2±8.1 years and mean pre-operative stone diameter was 3.1±3.5 cm. Three patients suprapubic cystolithotomy, two patients percutaneous cystolithotripsy, two patients percutaneous nephrolithitomy, two patients extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, one patient per urethral cystolithotripsy/cystolitholapexy, and one patient ureteroscopy/flexible ureteroscopy were done. The male-to-female ratio was 9/2. Stone-free rate was 100% after single session of treatment. In the post-operative period, fever was observed in two patients, and urinary leakage through wound site in one patient.

Conclusion: Stone surgery after urinary diversion is challenging, success of treatment depends on experience of surgical team, pre-operative preparation, and correct instrumentations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
32
PDF
47

Downloads

Published

2023-06-01

How to Cite

Arvind Kumar, Anurag Dubey, Praveen Lakhera, Prashant Patel, Avinash Pratap Singh Thakur, & Fanindra Singh Solanki. (2023). Feasibility of urolithiasis management after studer neobladder urinary diversion: A multicenter center study. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 14(6), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v14i6.51167

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 6 (2023)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).