Congenital Anomalies at Birth: A Hospital Based Study in UAE

Authors

  • L Aryasinghe Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman
  • D Moezzi Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman
  • TA Ansari Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman
  • E Mathew Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman
  • SA Sharbatti Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman
  • RB Shaikh Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/jnps.v32i2.5995

Keywords:

Congenital anomalies, congenital malformations, risk factors, maternal and infant variables, Hospital-record based,

Abstract

Introduction: It is widely acknowledged that congenital anomalies heavily contribute to infant morbidity and mortality worldwide, with an estimated 9 million infants (7% of all births) born annually having a serious congenital anomaly that result in death or lifelong disability. The objective of our study was to estimate the frequency of congenital anomalies at the Gulf Medical College Hospital and Research Center, Ajman and to estimate the proportion of births with congenital anomalies per 1,000 live births.

Materials and Methods: It was a Hospital-Record based descriptive study of the 1,222 consecutive live births from December 2007 to June 2008.

Results: There were 84 cases of congenital anomalies among the 1,222 live births; the rate of anomalous births was 68.7 per 1,000 live births or 6.9%. Anomalies of the genitourinary system (40.5%) were the most common, followed by musculoskeletal (28.6%) and cardiovascular (10.7%). Gastrointestinal, chromosomal and multiple system anomalies accounted for 3.6% each and miscellaneous anomalies were seen in 7.1%. Central Nervous system (2.4%) anomalies were the least. Congenital hydrocele (19.0%) was seen to have the highest frequency amongst all recorded anomalies, followed by Talipes or Clubfoot (14.3%). 9.3% of the male and 4.3% of the female population of live births had a congenital anomaly. Birth Weight (p=0.005) and Gender (p=0.001) were found to have significant association with the frequency of birth defects. Maternal Age, gravidity, parity, previous abortions, VDRL and Hepatitis B status, Gestational Diabetes, Pregnancy Induced Hypertension, gestational age, maternal and infant blood group, nationality and consanguinity showed no statistically significant association with congenital anomalies.

Conclusion: The proportion of congenital anomalies found in our study is alarmingly high and emphasizes the need for more accessible nationwide screening, counseling and surveillance systems.

J. Nepal Paediatr. Soc. 32(2) 2012 105-112

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jnps.v32i2.5995

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
1232
PDF
1230

Downloads

Published

2012-10-01

How to Cite

Aryasinghe, L., Moezzi, D., Ansari, T., Mathew, E., Sharbatti, S., & Shaikh, R. (2012). Congenital Anomalies at Birth: A Hospital Based Study in UAE. Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society, 32(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.3126/jnps.v32i2.5995

Issue

Vol. 32 No. 2 (2012)

Section

Original Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).