Early Experiences with Indigenous Medicated Spacers in the Management of Infected Hip Prosthesis.

Authors

  • Pankaj Chand Department of Orthopedics, Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu,
  • Suchil Rana Magar Department of Orthopedics, Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu,
  • Bishnu Babu Thapa Department of Orthopedics, Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu,
  • Bachhu Ram KC Department of Orthopedics, Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu,
  • Amit Joshi Department of Orthopedics, Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu,
  • Nirab Kayastha Department of Orthopedics, Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v11i1.7765

Keywords:

indigenous, reimplantation, spacers

Abstract

Introduction: Joint replacement surgery, has become one of the most frequent prosthetic surgeries over the past decades due to its success in restoring function to disabled arthritic individual. A two-stage revision arthroplasty is a well-accepted method for the treatment of a deep infection of a hip with a joint implant. In the present study, the results of three infected hips with the interim use of an indigenous cemented prosthesis along with gentamycin impregnated cement beads were assessed with a two stage revision.

Methods: Three consecutive patients who were managed with a two-stage revision hip arthroplasty for the treatment of a previous infection, with retained implants, were followed clinically and radiographically for an average of 15 months. Following removal of implants and debridement (first stage), an indigenous medicated prosthesis along with antibiotic coated cement beads were implanted, for an interim phase of six - eight weeks aft er which a new prosthesis was placed ( second stage ).In this period antibiotics ( both intravenous and oral) were administered to the patients.

Results: In a mean follow up period of 15 months, there is no evidence of recurrent infection in all three patients, as of now. The use of antibiotic coated cement prosthesis along with gentamycin mixed cement beads was associated with a satisfactory hip score, and better walking capacity in the interim period, a lower transfusion requirement at the time of reimplantation, and no postoperative dislocation.

Conclusions: Locally prepared medicated spacer and gentamycin coated beads help in eradicating hip infection, besides being more cost effective.

Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital; Jan-June 2012/vol.11/Issue1/32-36

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v11i1.7765

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
924
PDF
491

Downloads

Published

2013-03-13

How to Cite

Chand, P., Magar, S. R., Thapa, B. B., KC, B. R., Joshi, A., & Kayastha, N. (2013). Early Experiences with Indigenous Medicated Spacers in the Management of Infected Hip Prosthesis. Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital, 11(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v11i1.7765

Issue

Section

Original Articles