Comparative Seismic Performance Evaluation of RC Dual System Buildings Under NBC 105:2020 and IS 1893:2016 Across Varying Heights

Authors

  • Raju Pal Department of Civil Engineering, Thapathali Campus, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Rojseen Shrestha Department of Civil Engineering, Thapathali Campus, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Mantu Shrivastav Department of Civil Engineering, Thapathali Campus, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/injet.v3i2.95576

Keywords:

Seismic Performance, Response Spectrum Method, Base Shear, Lateral Storey Displacement, Inter-Storey Drift, Fundamental Time Period

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative seismic performance evaluation of reinforced concrete (RC) dual system buildings, comprising shear walls and moment-resisting frames, of varying heights (4, 8, and 16 storeys) analyzed under NBC 105:2020 and IS 1893 (Part I):2016. Key seismic performance indices base shear, lateral storey displacement, inter-storey drift, and fundamental time period are systematically compared using the Response Spectrum Method. NBC 105:2020 yields significantly higher seismic demands, with base shear ratios of approximately 1.6, 3.0, and 5.2 times that of IS 1893:2016 for 4-, 8-, and 16-storey buildings, respectively. These differences arise from NBC 105:2020's probabilistic seismic hazard framework, higher spectral accelerations, and the combined application of ductility and overstrength factors in place of a single response reduction factor. The study highlights the conservative nature of NBC 105:2020 and its implications for structural design economy and safety in seismically active regions like Nepal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
4
PDF
2

Downloads

Published

2026-06-18

How to Cite

Pal, R., Shrestha, R., & Shrivastav, M. (2026). Comparative Seismic Performance Evaluation of RC Dual System Buildings Under NBC 105:2020 and IS 1893:2016 Across Varying Heights. International Journal on Engineering Technology, 3(2), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.3126/injet.v3i2.95576