A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteric Calculus

Authors

  • Rajan Koju Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1691
  • Hemnath Joshi Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal
  • Sujan Makaju Shrestha Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal
  • Robin Karmacharya Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal
  • Narendra Shalike Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal

Keywords:

Laser lithotripsy, pneumatic litotripsy, Ureteric calculus

Abstract

Introduction: There are various modalities of breaking urinary tract calculus. The aim of this study was to compare outcome between laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in patients with upper ureteric calculus in terms of stone free rate, proximal migration and complication.

Methods: This was a prospective comparative study done in 210 patients with upper ureteric calculus. The patients were randomized into two groups (Laser Lithotripsy and Pneumatic Lithotripsy) from April 2018 to June 2019. The main objective of both the procedures was to break stone into particles less than 3 mm which was confirmed by X-ray KUB and ultrasonography of abdomen and pelvis after six weeks and to compare effectiveness in terms of immediate stone free rate, proximal migration, operative duration and post-operative complication.

Results: There was no difference in age, gender and stone size in both groups. Immediate stone free rate was 99.05% in Laser Lithotripsy and 76.19% in Pneumatic Lithotripsy (p value<0.001). Proximal migration in Laser Lithotripsy was 0.95% and 23.81% in Pneumatic Lithotripsy (p<0.001). There was significantly prolonged operative duration in Pneumatic Lithotripsy (14.7±4.77 min vs 13.31±3.24 in Laser Lithotripsy, p=0.014). Complications were more in Pneumatic Lithotripsy group, which was statistically significant (p=0.017).

Conclusion: Both pneumatic and laser lithotripsy are effective and safe modalities for treating upper ureteric calculus, however laser has less chances of proximal migration and higher immediate stone free rate with less complication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
29
PDF
75

Author Biographies

Rajan Koju, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal

Lecturer, Department of Surgery

Hemnath Joshi, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal

Associate Professor, Department of Surgery

Sujan Makaju Shrestha, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal

Lecturer, Department of Surgery

Robin Karmacharya, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal

Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery

Narendra Shalike, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal

Lecturer, Department of Surgery

Downloads

Published

2020-06-06

How to Cite

Koju, R., Joshi, H., Shrestha, S. M., Karmacharya, R., & Shalike, N. (2020). A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteric Calculus. Journal of Lumbini Medical College, 8(1), 55–59. Retrieved from https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JLMC/article/view/40710

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles