Common Pitfalls in using Online Platforms for Data collection in COVID times and its implications

Authors

  • Hariom Kumar Solanki Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Greater Noida Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh
  • Giridara Gopal P Scientist-C, Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
  • Rama Shankar Rath All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v10i4.31614

Keywords:

Online data, COVID-19, Pitfalls

Abstract

In recent COVID-19 times conducting online research is the only feasible type of research for many authors. However, like other methods of data collection this method also bears some inherent issues linked to method of the study. The authors must understand the common pitfalls related to online data collection before planning and before interpreting the results. This letter mainly deals with the issues related to the online data collection. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
344
PDF
287

Downloads

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

Solanki, H. K., P, G. G., & Rath, R. S. (2020). Common Pitfalls in using Online Platforms for Data collection in COVID times and its implications. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology, 10(4), 930–932. https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v10i4.31614

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 4 (2020)

Section

Letters to the Editor

License

  • Upon acceptance Copyright on any research article is transferred in full to the Confederation of Epidemiological Associations (CEA) and International Nepal Epidemiological Association (INEA).  The copyright transfer includes the right to reproduce and distribute the article in any form of reproduction (printing, electronic media or any other form).
  • Articles in the Nepal Journal of Epidemiology are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
  • This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.