Perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

  • Hyder Mohammad Waseem Din Altnagelvin Area Hospital, Londonderry, United Kingdom
  • Yamini Saraswathi Gurram Dr. Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Foundation, Vijayawada, India
  • Aimen Mansur King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Mohammad Maroof Shahid Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Tayyaba Binte Saleem Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, Florida, United States
  • Karoona Kumari Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan
  • Beesham Kumar Jinnah Medical & Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Pershan Kumar Jinnah Medical & Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Maira Shahid Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Mahmud Seyi Abdurrahman Richmond Gabriel University, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Muneeb Khawar King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v16i1.92321

Keywords:

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, Gastric Cancer, Perioperative chemotherapy, Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer is not responsive to surgery and perioperative chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been effective in advanced disease. This meta-analysis assesses the benefits of the addition of ICIs to perioperative chemotherapy in case of resectable gastric/GEJ cancer.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science were identified until 2026. Randomized controlled trials with comparison of perioperative ICI with chemotherapy against chemotherapy were included. A random-effects model was used to. Risk ratios was calculated for all the dichotomous outcomes. I² was used to assess the heterogeneity.

Results: Four trials (2,125 patients) were included. ICI plus chemotherapy, however, had significant positive effects on pathological complete response (RR = 2.87; 95% CI: 1.66 -4.99; p = 0.018) and complete tumour regression (RR = 2.74; 95% CI: 1.24 -6.04; p = 0.006). No significant different was found for R0 resection rates and surgery completion between the two groups. Similarly, no significant different was found for adverse events, surgical morbidity, or deaths. However, immune-related adverse events (RR = 3.18; 95% CI: 2.48–4.08) and treatment discontinuation (RR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11–1.54) were significantly higher in ICI plus chemotherapy group.

Conclusion: The inclusion of ICIs in perioperative chemotherapy enhances pathological response and does not pose more surgical risk. Although adverse events were high in the ICI plus chemotherapy group so large scale studies are needed to validate these findings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
0
PDF
0

Downloads

Published

2026-04-02

How to Cite

Din, H. M. W., Gurram, Y. S., Mansur, A., Shahid, M. M., Saleem, T. B., Kumari, K., … Khawar, M. (2026). Perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology, 16(1), 1412–1423. https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v16i1.92321

Issue

Section

Systematic Reviews