A Comparative Analysis between Collective Action Theory and Compulsion Theory of Sustainability

Authors

  • Lila Prasad Limbu Ratna Rajyalaxmi Campus, Tribhuvan University, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/hssj.v13i1.44565

Keywords:

compulsion, inplementation, advance countries, Huhan, policy

Abstract

This paper has been drawn by taking the following objectives: To review the prevention policies and plans of COVID-19. (ii) To fulfill the gap between the collective action and the Compulsion theory of sustainability. The researcher has used a descriptive research design because he has collected only secondary data from books, journal articles, policies, and reports from different websites. After analyzing those data, the researcher found that all countries' prevention policies are the same. Some Asian countries like Japan, China, and South Korea firmly created the compulsion on ordinary people, health institutions, government authority, and other stakeholders can control COVID-19. On the other hand, some European like Italy, France, and Germany could not create strong compulsion; they could not hold COVID-19. Hence, compulsion is necessary for making plans and policies to get success. In addition, the researcher did not examine the human ecological and environmental aspects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
89
PDF
63

Author Biography

Lila Prasad Limbu, Ratna Rajyalaxmi Campus, Tribhuvan University, Nepal

Lecturer, Department of Rural Development

Downloads

Published

2021-08-01

How to Cite

Limbu, L. P. (2021). A Comparative Analysis between Collective Action Theory and Compulsion Theory of Sustainability. Humanities and Social Sciences Journal, 13(1), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.3126/hssj.v13i1.44565

Issue

Section

Articles